Genetic diversity and antifungal susceptibilities of environmental Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii species complexes

Cryptococcosis is an opportunistic systemic mycosis caused by Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii species complexes and is of increasing global importance. Maintaining continued surveillance of the antifungal susceptibility of environmental C. neoformans and C. gattii isolates is desirable for better managing cryptococcosis by identifying resistant isolates and revealing the emergence of intrinsically resistant species. Relevant research data from Egypt are scarce. Thus, this study aimed to report the genetic diversity of C. neoformans and C. gattii species complexes originating from different environmental sources in Egypt, antifungal susceptibility profiles, antifungal combinations, and correlations of susceptibility with genotypes. A total of 400 environmental samples were collected, 220 from birds and 180 from trees. Cryptococcus spp. were found in 58 (14.5%) of the samples, 44 (75.9%) of the isolates were recovered from birds and 14 (24.1%) from trees. These isolates were genotyped using M13 polymerase chain reaction-fingerprinting and URA5 gene restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Of the 31 C. neoformans isolates, 24 (77.4%), 6 (19.4%) and one (4.4%) belonged to VNI, VNII, and VNIII genotypes, respectively. The 27 C. gattii isolates belonged to VGI (70.4%), VGII (18.5%), and VGIII (11.1%) genotypes. Non-wild type C. neoformans and C. gattii isolates that may have acquired resistance to azoles, amphotericin B (AMB), and terbinafine (TRB) were observed. C. gattii VGIII was less susceptible to fluconazole (FCZ) and itraconazole (ITZ) than VGI and VGII. C. neoformans isolates showed higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to FCZ, ITZ, and voriconazole (VRZ) than those of C. gattii VGI and VGII. Significant (P < 0.001) correlations were found between the MICs of VRZ and ITZ (r = 0.64) in both C. neoformans and C. gattii isolates, FCZ and TRB in C. neoformans isolates, and FCZ and TRB (r = 0.52) in C. gattii isolates. There is no significant differences in the MICs of TRB in combination with FCZ (P = 0.064) or in combination with AMB (P = 0.543) and that of TRB alone against C. gattii genotypes. By calculating the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index, the combination of FCZ + AMB was synergistic against all tested genotypes. These findings expand our knowledge of ecological niches, genetic diversity, and resistance traits of C. neoformans and C. gattii genotypes in Egypt. Further investigations into how they are related to clinical isolates in the region are warranted. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43008-024-00153-w.


Introduction
Cryptococcosis is a systemic life-threatening opportunistic fungal disease that affects internal organs and skin in both humans and animals, particularly in immunocompromised hosts (Alves et al. 2016).Cryptococcus infection is acquired by inhalation of basidiospores and/or desiccated yeast cells from environmental sources, including pigeon (Columba livia) excreta, plant debris, and decayed wood.Initial pulmonary infection can occur by penetrating the lung, causing acute pneumonia, with subsequent dissemination to the brain (manifesting as highly fatal meningitis) and other organs (Velagapudi et al. 2009;Harris et al. 2012;Walsh et al. 2019).
Among the numerous Cryptococcus species, Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii species complexes are considered the primary causative agents of cryptococcosis which has a global distribution (Kwon-Chung et al. 2014;Fang et al. 2015).Although most infected patients with disseminated cryptococcosis are immunocompromised, C. neoformans can cause disease in apparently healthy hosts.In contrast, a significantly higher proportion of immunocompetent patients are affected by C. gattii infections (Kwon-Chung et al. 2014).
Cryptococcosis is an important disease that affects a wide range of animals worldwide, including cattle, sheep, goats, horses, cats, dogs, and birds.In domestic animals, it is commonly associated with mastitis in cattle, sheep, and goats, as well as endometritis and placentitis in mares (Refai et al. 2017).However, a variety of other animals, including terrestrial wildlife species and marine mammals, can also show clinical signs, pathological findings, and potential underlying causes of cryptococcosis.This may be due to the animal's behaviour and environmental exposures.For example, Koalas primarily exhibit pulmonary lesions caused by C. gattii species (VGI and VGII) as a result of their behaviour and environmental exposure to Eucalyptus trees (Danesi et al. 2021).
The most used approaches for genotyping are PCR fingerprinting, restricted fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis.These methods have demonstrated the ability to distinguish between molecular types of Cryptococcus genus in both clinical and environmental isolates (Meyer et al. 2009;Hagen et al. 2015;Chen et al. 2018).
DNA typing techniques, using microsatellite-specific primer [GACA]4, divided C. neoformans into four major molecular types (AFLP1/VNI, AFLP1A/VNB/ VNII, AFLP1B/ VNII, AFLP3/VNIII, and AFLP2/VNIV).These types are characterized by differences in pathogenicity, geographical distribution, and susceptibility to antifungal treatments (Pini et al. 2017).Environmental isolates of C. neoformans recovered from pigeon droppings in East China were genetically more divers than clinical isolates (Chen et al. 2021).In Korea, a strong linkage was observed between clinical and environmental Cryptococcus isolates (Park et al. 2015).Additionally, environmental Cryptococcus isolates VNI and VGII were similar to those causing human infection in Brazil (Alves et al. 2016) and Latin America (Firacative et al. 2021).C. gattii VGII was also found to be responsible for animal infections in Latin America (Firacative et al. 2021).On Vancouver Island (Canada), C. gattii VGII was identified as the most prevalent molecular type in human, animal infections, and environmental samples (Kidd et al. 2004).
Long-term usage of therapeutic and/or prophylactic antifungal drugs has led to the emergence of resistance in C. neoformans and C. gattii species (Arechavala et al. 2009).Thus, antifungal susceptibility is important in epidemiological investigations for tracking susceptibility profiles and drug resistance (Taha et al. 2020).Differences in the antifungal susceptibility of C. neoformans and C. gattii species complexes have been reported to differ according to genotype and geographic origin of isolates (Andrade- Silva et al. 2023;Chong et al. 2010;Hagen et al. 2010;Iqbal et al. 2010;Trilles et al. 2012).For instance, C. gattii VGII isolates from Australia, Canada, and USA have been reported to be less susceptible to azoles than other molecular types (Chong et al. 2010;Hagen et al. 2010).Environmental C. neoformans isolates recovered from pigeon droppings in China were fluconazole-resistant, and the rate of itraconazole resistance was higher than that of clinical isolates (Chen et al. 2021).
Taken together, this study was the first to investigate the genotypes and susceptibility profiles of environmental C. neoformans and C. gattii species complexes from different localities in Egypt.

Environmental samples collection
A total of 400 samples were collected between October and December 2019.The samples comprised of 220 bird droppings and 180 samples were obtained from the leaves and woody trunks of Eucalyptus and olive trees.Specifically, 120 pigeon droppings were obtained from pigeon nests in pet shops, houses, and towers in Zagazig city and Miniaelqmh city, Sharkia Governorate.Additionally, captive bird (canary) droppings (50 samples) were collected from pet shops and houses in Zagazig city.Furthermore, 50 zoo bird droppings were collected from four large cages in Giza Zoo, Egypt.All samples were collected using a clean spatula and stored in clean plastic bags, which were then kept refrigerated until examination.The Eucalyptus tree samples (n = 130) were collected from various locations in Cairo, Sharkia, and Qalubiya Governorates.The olive tree samples (n = 50) were collected from private houses and farms located in Cairo, Sharkia, and the Cairo-Alexandria Desert Road.

Isolation and identification of yeast isolates
To prepare each bird dropping for testing, a suspension was prepared by adding 9 mL of sterile saline solution to 1 g of the sample.The resulting mixture was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min.The sediment was subsequently inoculated onto two Petri plates of Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) medium supplemented with chloramphenicol (Himedia, India).The plates were then incubated at 25ºC and 37ºC for 72 h (Li et al. 2000).The preparation of the Eucalyptus and olive tree samples were prepared as previously described (Kidd et al. 2007).Briefly, five grams of each specimen was suspended in 25 mL of sterile saline solution.The mixture was then vortexed and allowed to settle for approximately20 min.A loopful of each sample was inoculated onto two SDA plates and incubated at 25ºC and 37ºC for 72 h.
Creamy, mucoid yeast isolates were picked from the primary culture onto SDA slopes using a sterile loop.The identification process involved both phenotypic and molecular methods.Cryptococcus isolates were identified based on macromorphology, micromorphology, and physiological characters such as urea hydrolysis and changing color on Cryptococcus differential agar medium (Himedia, India) (Granados and Castañeda 2005;Singh et al. 2013).

Molecular identification and genotyping of Cryptococcus species isolates
Multiplex PCR for Cryptococcus species identification DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (catalog no.51304; Sigma, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions.The amplification reaction (50 μL per sample) included 25 μL of EmeraldAmp GT PCR mastermix (Code No. RR310A, Takara, USA), 1 μL (20 pmol) of each primer targeting the aminotransferase gene of C. neoformans (CNa-70S forward 5ˊATT GCG TCC ACC AAG GAG CTC 3ˊ and CNa-70A reverse 5ˊATT GCG TCC ATG TTA CGT GGC 3ˊ) and the polymerase gene of C. gattii (CNb-49S forward 5ˊATT GCG TCC AAG GTG TTG TTG 3ˊ and CNb-49A reverse 5ˊATT GCG TCC ATC CAA CCG TTATC 3ˊ targeting), 6 μL of template DNA, and nuclease-free water up to 50 μL.The amplification parameters consisted of primary denaturation at 94 °C for 8 min; 35 cycles of secondary denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 56 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min; and a final extension at 72 °C for 8 min (Leal et al. 2008).

Fingerprinting PCR
PCR was performed using the minisatellite-specific core sequence of the wild-type phage M13 primer (5ˊGAG GGT GGC GGT TCT 3ˊ) in a total volume of 50 µL for 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 20 s, annealing at 50 °C for 1 min, and extensions at 72 °C for 20 s, followed by a final extension cycle for 6 min at 72 °C (Meyer et al. 2003).PCR fingerprinting types (VNI-VNII-VNIII and VGI-VGII-VGIII) were assigned according to the major bands that were typical for that pattern.Bands were included in the analysis regardless of their intensity if they were visible.

URA5 gene RFLP analysis
PCR amplification of the orotidine monophosphate pyrophosphorylase (URA5) gene was performed using the URA5 (5ˊATG TCC TCC CAA GCC CTC GAC TCC G 3ˊ) and SJ01 (5ˊTTA AGA CCT CTG AAC ACC GTA CTC 3ˊ) primers.Thirty-five cycles of initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, second denaturation at 94 °C for 45 s, annealing at 61 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72°Cfor 2 min, followed by a final extension cycle for 10 min at 72 °C (Meyer et al. 2003).Amplification products were mixed with one fifth volume of loading buffer, 15 µL of PCR products was double digested with Sau96I (10 U/ µL) and HhaI (20 U/µl) for 3 h.RFLP patterns were assigned by comparing them with the patterns obtained from the standard strains (VNI-VNIII and VGI-VGIII).The molecular types for each isolate were determined by comparing the obtained M13 PCR fingerprint profiles and URA5 RFLP patterns with the respective standard patterns for each molecular type.
For AMB, the MICs were defined as the lowest concentration causing 100% growth inhibition.For FCZ, VRZ, and ITZ, the MICs were the lowest concentrations that produced a 50% reduction in growth.However, for TRB, the MICs were defined as the lowest concentration that caused 80% inhibition of growth, compared to the drug-free growth control.The MICs that inhibited 50% (MIC 50 ) and 90% (MIC 90 ) of the isolates were calculated as previously described (Hamilton-Miller 1991).

Chequerboard assay
To evaluate the drug interactions, a chequerboard microdilution test was conducted with three different combinations of antifungals: FCZ + AMB, FCZ + TRB, and AMB + TRB.The antifungals AMB, FCZ, and TRB were dissolved and diluted in RPMI 1640.The inoculums were 0.5 × 10 3 to 2.5 × 10 3 CFU/mL, and the drug dilutions ranged from 0.06 to 8 µg/mL for AMB, 0.25-16 µg/mL for FCZ, and 0.06-8 µg/mL for TRB.The plates were incubated at 35 °C for 72 h.The drug interaction coefficient was evaluated using the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index, which was calculated by the following formula: The interaction between antifungals was categorized based on the FIC index.If the FIC index was ≤ 0.5, the interaction was classified as synergistic.If the FIC index was > 0.5 and ≤ 4, the interaction was classified as indifferent.Conversely, if the FIC index was > 4.0, the interaction was deemed as antagonistic (Odds, 2003).
Clinical breakpoints (CBPs) are unavailable for antifungal drugs, so epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) were calculated to provide an early warning of isolates with reduced susceptibility to the tested drug (Dalhoff . 2009;Espinel-Ingroff et al. 2012a, b).The ECV is the highest MIC value that represents the upper limit of the distribution of MICs for wild-type (WT) isolates (without acquired drug resistance).The ECV is determined by analyzing a population of isolates from a specific species and selecting the value that represents the highest end of the distribution of MICs.The ECVs were set at ≥ 97.5% of the MIC value of the statistically modeled population (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2022).Isolates having an MIC value higher than the ECV is interpreted as non-wild-type (NWT).

Data analysis
Statistical analysis and data visualization were performed with R software (R Core Team, 2022; version 4.2.0).Hierarchical clustering analysis of M13-fingerprinting and URA5 RFLP of C. neoformans and C. gattii was performed using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA).Dendrograms were constructed based on M13-fingerprinting and RFLP analysis of the URA5 gene, using the "factoextra" package.The "Complex heatmap" package (Gu et al. 2016) was used to construct the heatmap, whereas, the "corrplot" package (Wei et al. 2017) was used to assess the correlation between MICs of antifungal drugs against C. neoformans and C. gattii.Furthermore, the "psych" package (Revelle 2011) was used to calculate the MIC geometric means.The significant difference between the MICs of each antifungal against each genotype was determined using one-way analysis of variance.Multiple comparisons between the means were assessed at significance thresholds obtained from the Bonferroni correction.P-values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.

Isolation and identification of Cryptococcus spp.
A total of 400 environmental samples were collected, 220 from birds and 180 from trees.Cryptococcus spp.were found in 58 (14.5%) of the samples, 44 (75.9%) of which were isolated from birds and 14 (24.1%) from trees (Table 1).A total of 120 pigeon droppings were collected, 23 (19.17%) of which tested positive for Cryptococcus spp.Similarly, 8 (16%) Cryptococcus isolates were isolated from 50 captive bird droppings, and 13 (26%) isolates were isolated from 50 zoo bird droppings.In addition, 130 Eucalyptus tree samples were collected from Cairo, Sharkia Governorate, and the Cairo-Alexandria Desert Road, and 9 Cryptococcus isolates (6.92%) were obtained from the leaves and woody trunks.Furthermore, out of the 50 olive tree samples examined, 5 (10%) isolates were recovered (Table 1).
Cryptococcus species were identified based on their phenotype (macromorphological, micromorphological, biochemical characters) and molecular identification.

Differentiation of C. neoformans and C. gattii isolates
All the isolates were subcultured on CDA media and observed for any color change.After five days of incubation, 24 isolates were recovered, including 6 from Eucalyptus tree samples, 5 from olive tree samples, 12 from zoo bird droppings, and one from pigeon dropping.These isolates produced brown mucoid colonies and were identified as C. gattii.The other isolates, which included 3 from Eucalyptus tree samples, 22 from pigeon droppings, 8 from captive bird droppings, and one from zoo bird drooping, produced light blue dry colonies and were identified as C. neoformans. Notably

Genotyping of C. neoformans and C. gattii species complexes
Fifty-eight C. neoformans and C. gattii isolates formerly identified using phenotypic methods and multiplex PCR were subjected to PCR fingerprinting with the M13 primer.PCR fingerprinting types VNI-VNIII and VGI-VGIII were assigned according to the typical major bands observed for each pattern (Supplementary Fig. 1A and B).Only visible bands were included in the analysis regardless of their intensity.Of the 31 C. neoformans isolates, 24 (77.4%), 6 (19.4%) and one (4.4%)belonged to the VNI, VNII, and VNIII genotypes, respectively (Table 1).Genotype VNIII was detected only in pigeon droppings.In contrast, the 27 C. gattii isolates belonged to VGI (70.4%),VGII (18.5%), and VGIII (11.1%) genotypes.
RFLP analysis of the URA5 gene with the restriction enzymes Sau961 and HhaI in a double digest, revealed two restriction patterns of 447 and 248 bp specific for C. neoformans and 324 and 124 bp for C. gattii (Supplementary Fig. 1C).RFLP patterns were assigned visually by comparison with the patterns obtained from the standard strains (VNI-VNIII and VGI-VGIII).The RFLP analysis of the URA 5 gene in C. neoformans and C. gattii revealed 28 unique profiles.A dendrogram was created to group strains based on their similarity, resulting in 5 clusters (Fig. 1).The first two clusters included C. neoformans from various sources, while the remaining three clusters included C. gattii.The genotypes of both C. neoformans and C. gattii were randomly distributed among the clusters.
Multiple comparisons between MICs of C. neoformans and C. gattii genotypes showed no significant differences (P > 0.05) (Table 4).Similarly, no significant differences were found between MICs of C. gattii genotypes except between the MICs of FCZ and ITZ of genotypes VGI vs VGIII and VGII and VGIII.C. gattii VGIII showed less susceptibility to FCZ and ITZ than VGI and VGII (Table 4).
Many significant correlations were detected between MICs of antifungals against C. neoformans and C. gattii genotypes (Fig. 3).Spearman correlation analysis among MICs revealed significant (P < 0.001) correlations between VRZ and ITZ (r = 0.64) for both C. neoformans and C. gattii isolates; between FCZ and TRB for the C. neoformans isolates; and between FCZ and TRB (r = 0.52) for C. gattii isolates.

Antifungal combinations for C. neoformans and C. gattii species complexes
The effects of three different antifungal combinations were tested against C. neoformans and C. gattii genotypes and the MICs before and after combination were evaluated (Table 5).When FCZ + AMB, FCZ + TRB and AMB + TRB were combined, the MICs of FCZ in combination were significantly lower than those of FCZ alone against both C. neoformans (P = 0.007 and 0.008) and C. gattii (P = 0.023 and 0.011) genotypes.However, the MICs of AMB in combination were significantly lower than those of AMB alone against only C. gattii (P = 0.015 and 0.003) genotypes.On the other hand, there is no significant differences in the MICs of TRB in combination with FCZ (P = 0.064) or in combination with AMB (P = 0.543) and that of TRB alone against C. gattii genotypes.

Discussion
Yeast of the genus Cryptococcus is a highly potential basidiomycetous fungal pathogen for human and animal health.Inhalation of infective basidiospores is the primary route of infection with this fungus, and the environment plays a significant role in the spread of C. neoformans infection in humans and animals (May et al. 2016).C. neoformans and C. gattii species complexes are the global isolates responsible for Cryptococcus infection and are commonly recovered from pigeon droppings, soil, and decaying wood in hollow trees (Firacative et al. 2021).This study aimed to investigate the presence of C. neoformans and C. gattii species complexes isolates from environmental sources, and to determine their molecular types and antifungal susceptibility patterns.Notably, this study is the first to conduct genotyping and antifungal susceptibility analysis of environmental C. neoformans and C. gattii species complexes in Egypt.Out of 400 environmental samples, 58 isolates (14.5%) were identified as Cryptococcus spp.This proportion is higher than that found in the study of Gugnani et al. (2020) in the Dutch Caribbean, where only 4.3% of the total isolates were identified as Cryptococcus spp.and were found in pigeon droppings and woody debris from various trees.Similarly, Chen et al. ( 2021) reported 61 (6.6%) C. neoformans isolates out of 929 pigeon droppings in East China.However, this study did not isolate any C. neoformans or C. gattii from 309 samples of decayed debris from tree hollows (Chen et al. 2021).
Our study showed that C. gattii was present in the leaves and woody trunks of olive trees (10%) and Eucalyptus trees (6.92%), indicating that these trees are crucial reservoirs for Cryptococcus spp.The isolation rates from Eucalyptus trees were slightly lower than the 11.8%     (Pini et al. 2017).Park et al. (2015) and Firacative et al. (2021) also reported that VNI was the most common molecular type among clinical and environmental isolates in Korea and Latin America.However, our findings differed from those of Dou et al. (2017) who reported a lower rate of C. neoformans VNI (18.6%) in China.
Clinical breakpoints (CBPs) for the C. neoformans and C. gattii species complexes are unavailable because they rely on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, animal studies, and clinical outcomes of therapy (Espinel-Ingroff et al. 2012b).Additionally, there are limited data on the ECV of environmental C. neoformans isolates (Espinel-Ingroff et al. 2012a, b).The absence of recognized cutoff points for interpreting antifungal susceptibility results makes it difficult to characterize Cryptococcus spp.antifungal resistance in the laboratory.ECVs offer a sensitive mean to identify evolving antimicrobial resistance when CBPs are absent (Pfaller et al. 2011).However, when each genotype was assessed independently, the ECV values varied, indicating that the levels of ECVs may differ depending on the genotype and/or species involved (Reichert-Lima et al. 2016).
Considering that the susceptibilities of C. neoformans (VNI and VNII) and C. gattii (VGI and VGII) isolates differed, C. neoformans isolates had higher MICs of FCZ, ITZ, and VRZ than C. gattii (Table 4).Both species have nearly similar susceptibilities to KETO, AMB, and TRB (MIC 90 16 µg/mL , 4 µg/mL, and 2 µg/mL, respectively) (Tables 3 and 4).However, previous studies have reported contrasting results.Gutch et al. (2015) found that C. gattii isolates may have acquired resistance to FCZ and KETO than C. neoformans isolates, and Reichert-Lima et al. (2016) found significant differences between the susceptibility of C. gattii VGII and C. neoformans VNI to FCZ, ITZ, and TRB, with the C. gattii VGII being NWT.Additionally, C. gattii VGIII was less susceptible to FCZ and ITZ than VGI and VGII (Tables 3 and 4).Trilles et al. (2012) reported that C. gattii VGII was the least WT to the tested antifungals followed by C. neoformans VNI and C. gattii VGI, indicating a relationship between genotype and antifungal susceptibility profile.
Low MICs were observed for the investigated combinations (Table 5), and a synergistic effect against Cryptococcus was noted, indicating that fewer drug doses are needed when antifungal agents are combined (Reichert-Lima et al. 2016).Other studies have reported a similar in vitro synergistic effects between AMB + FCZ, AMB + TRB and TRB + FCZ against clinical C. neoformans VNI, VNII, and C. gattii VGII (Reichert-Lima et al. 2016); between azoles and TRB against Pythium insidiosum (Argenta et al. 2008), Cladophialophora carrioni, Fonsecaea pedrosoi, Phialophora verrucosa (Yu et al. 2008), and Mucor irregularis (Zhang et al. 2013).Guerra et al. (2012) reported a synergistic antifungal effect of TRB when TRB was combined with AMB, FLC, or ITC.The antifungal drugs used in the TRB + AMB and FCZ + TRB combinations inhibited or disrupted the ergosterol in the cell membrane through various mechanisms may explain the synergistic effects of these compounds (Zhang et al. 2013).Olsen et al. (2012) reported intestinal cryptococcosis caused by C. neoformans sensu lato in a dog that was unsuccessfully treated with AMB and FCZ.However, with TRB treatment, the case exhibited a full remission of clinical symptoms and a decrease in the cryptococcal antigen titre.

Conclusions
In conclusion, our study demonstrated that VNI and VGI are the dominant genotypes of C. neoformans and C. gattii species complexes among environmental isolates in Egypt.Notably, this study also detected NWT isolates that may have acquired azole-resistance such as FCZ, ITR, and VRZ, and TRB-resistance.The FCZ and AMB combination demonstrated synergistic effect against the tested genotypes.To develop new therapeutic approaches for treating cryptococcosis, further investigations combining various antifungal drugs in vitro and in vivo are needed.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Heatmap representation of Cryptococcus spp.genotypes isolated from bird droppings and trees in Egypt, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and interaction of antifungal agents reported in southern Italy(Romeo et al. 2011) and 12% in Nairobi, Kenya(Kangogo et al. 2014).However, in Croatia, Pllana-Hajdari et al. (2019)  reported a lower isolation rate of C. neoformans (0.8%) from olive trees and other tree species and (0%) from bird excreta.On the other hand, in Turkey, Ergin et al. (2019) found C. gattii in 22.4% of olive trees and 24.2% of Eucalyptus tree trunks.Differences in the isolation rates of C. neoformans and C. gattii species complexes may be attributed to intrinsic differences in colonization rate, isolation protocols, sample quality, the period of the study, other environmental factors in certain geographical regions, and methodological approaches carried out by researchers(Gutch et al. 2015).Among the 58 genotyped environmental isolates of C. neoformans and C. gattii species complexes in the present study, C. neoformans VNI was the most frequent genotype (41.38%).Similarly, the molecular type VNI

Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Spearman rank correlation test results based on the minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungal agents against C. neoformans and C. gattii genotypes.Blue color indicated positive correlation and red show negative correlation.Strikes (*) indicates significant at P < 0.05 , one C. gattii isolate was identified as C. neoformans and four C. neoformans isolates were identified as C. gattii by multiplex PCR.Multiplex PCR was performed using the CNa-70S and CNa-70A primers for C. neoformans and the CNb-49S and CNb-49A primers for C. gattii, resulting in amplicons of 695 and 448 bp for C. neoformans and C. gattii, respectively.Of the 58 Cryptococcus spp.isolated, 31 (53.4%) were C. neoformans and 27 (46.4%)were C. gattii (Table 1).Both C. neoformans and C. gattii were isolated from birds, but C. gattii was found only on trees.

Table 1
Frequency of Cryptococcus spp.isolated from bird droppings and tree samples

Table 2
Distribution of MICs of antifungal drugs against C. neoformans and C. gattii genotypes KETO Ketoconazole, AMB Amphotericin B, FCZ Fluconazole, ITZ Itraconazole, TRB Terbinafine, VRZ Voriconazole, MIC Minimum inhibitory concentration.Values in the grey cells indicate that the MICs lies outside the dilution range tested

Table 3
MIC range, mode, MIC 50 , MIC 90 , and geometric means of antifungal drugs against C. neoformans and C. gattii genotypes MIC Minimum inhibitory concentration, ECV Epidemiological cutoff value (MIC value at which ≥ 95% of the isolates are resistant), GM Geometric mean, NA Not available.MIC 50 and MIC 90 couldn't be estimated for isolates less than 10

Table 4
Comparison of MICs of antifungal agents against C. neoformans and C. gattii genotypes Grey cells indicate significant at P-value < 0.05.FCZ Fluconazole, AMB Amphotericin B, TRB Terbinafine

Table 5
Fractional minimum inhibitory concentration index of antifungal drug combinations against C. neoformans and C. gattii genotypes MIC Minimum inhibitory concentration, FCZ Fluconazole, AMB Amphotericin B, TRB Terbinafine, Comb in combination; P-value: of Paired t-test (significance level at P-value < 0.05) Cryptococcus isolates (Andrade-Silva et al. 2013), 44.83% of our environmental isolates were considered to be NWT to VRZ (MIC values of 2-8 μg/ mL).Similarly, NWT C. neoformans VNI and C. gattii VGI, VGII, and VGIII isolates that may have acquired resistance to ITZ, FCZ, and VRZ have been reported in Brazil and Latin America